BIOCHEMICAL, TECHNOLOGICAL AND CULINARY EVALUATION OF PEA GRAIN (PISUM SATIVUM L.) UNDER THE NORTHERN KAZAKHSTAN CONDITIONS
Rubrics: AGRONOMY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The objective of research is to biochemically and technologically evaluate collection varieties of different ecological and geographical origins and to isolate valuable source material as parental forms for breeding in the dry steppe zone of Northern Kazakhstan. Research was conducted at the accredited Analytical Center of the A. I. Baraev Scientific and Production Center of Farming in the Laboratory of Biochemistry and Technological Assessment of Agricultural Crops. The object of research was 25 varieties of field peas of leafy (11 varieties) and whiskered morphotypes (13 varieties) of various ecological and geographical origins (Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Great Britain, Italy, and Germany). The pea grain was grown in 2023 and 2024 on the breeding plots of the A. I. Baraev Scientific and Production Center for Grain Farming. The varieties were studied for biochemical (protein content) and technological (natural weight, 1000 grain weight, size, uniformity, filminess, kernel yield) quality indicators, as well as for culinary qualities (taste, color, uniformity and cooking time, cooking coefficient, overall score). In the group of varieties with a whiskered leaf type, the Shustrik variety (Russia) exceeded the Kasib standard (Kazakhstan) in a set of analyzed characteristics, having the highest 1000-grain weight (218.8 g), 76.0 % uniformity, and a grain size with a sieve number of 7.0–6.5. In comparison with the standard variety Өpіc (Kazakhstan), the Orlovchanin variety of the leaflet morphotype (Russia) stood out: 1000-grain weight of 214.8 g, grain uniformity of 74.2 %, and a grain size with a sieve number of 7.0–6.5. The Proteo variety (Italy) was also noted with a specific weight of 745 g/l, 1000-grain weight of 215.2 g, and a seed size with sieve numbers of 6.5–6.0. The most valuable varieties for breeding were identified based on a set of technological characteristics: thousand-kernel weight, grain size, and uniformity – Shustrik, Orlovchanin, and Proteo. Based on culinary evaluation (cooking time, cooked grain color, and overall culinary evaluation), the grain of the Chishminsky 229 (Russia) and Zimostoyky 339 (Russia) varieties was selected.

Keywords:
protein, pea, collection, leafy and tendril morphotypes of pea, culinary properties of pea, technological evaluation of pea grain
References

1. Serikbaev ZhK, Omarova AA, Isabekov BZh. Potencial zernobobovyh kul'tur v usloviyah zasushlivyh regionov Kazahstan. Agrarnaya nauka. 2019;4:25-31. (In Russ.).

2. Kumar J, Choudhary A, Singh G. Pea (Pisum sativum L.) improvement: challenges and opportunities. Legume Research. 2017;40(6):1019-1028.

3. Smýkal P, Coyne C, Ambrose M. Pea genetics and genomics. Plant Molecular Biology. 2015;87:3-19.

4. Smýkal P, Aubert G, Burstin J, et al. Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the genomic era. Agronomy. 2012;2(2):74-115. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy2020074.

5. Omel'yanyuk LV, Asanov AM, Pahotina IV, et al. Novyj sort goroha posevnogo Triumf Sibiri. Agrarnaya Rossiya. 2021;12:15-20. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30906/1999-5636-2021-12-15-20.

6. Kradeckaya OO, Oshergina IP, Dashkevich SM, et al. Ocenka kachestva zerna goroha posevnogo (Pisum Sativum L.) v usloviyah suhostepnoj zony Severnogo Kazahstana. Izdenister natigeler. 2025;1:165-172. (In Russ.).

7. Katyuk AI. Formirovanie belka i pishchevye dostoinstva perspektivnyh linij goroha v lesostepi Srednego Povolzh'ya. Agrarnyj vestnik Urala. 2021;12:41-49. (In Russ.).

8. Shurhaeva KD, Fadeeva AN, Abrosimova TN, et al. Novyj sort goroha Narat s cennymi svojstvami po kachestvu belka. Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury. 2023;4:156-161. (In Russ.).

9. Yang T, Liu R, Luo Y, et al. Improved pea reference genome and pan-genome highlight genomic features and evolutionary characteristics. Nature genetics. 2022;54(10):1553-1563. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01172-2.

10. Kazydub NG, Kuz'mina SP, Kocyubinskaya OA, et al. Zernobobovye kul'tury v strukture funkcional'nogo pitaniya (fasol' zernovaya i ovoshchnaya, goroh ovoshchnoj, nut. Byulleten' gosudarstvennogo Nikitskogo botanicheskogo sada. 2019;133:157-167. (In Russ.).

11. Rubiales D, Fondevilla S. Future prospects for pea crop. Grain Legumes. 2019;72:18-21.

12. Analiz rynka goroha v Kazahstane – 2026. Pokazateli i prognozy. Avaliable at: https://tebiz.ru/mi/analiz-rynka-gorokha-v-kazakhstane. Accesased: 11.06.2025; Posevnye ploschadi – 2025: akcent na maslichnye i bobovye – MSH RK. Avaliable at: https://margin.kz/news/14439/posevnye-ploschadi-2025-aktsent-na-maslichnye-i-bobovye-msh-rk. Accessed 16.09.2025.

13. Amangel'dy AT, Sejtkalieva GB. Vliyanie pogodnyh faktorov na produktivnost' zernobobovyh kul'tur v stepnoj zone Kazahstana. Vestnik sel'skohozyajstvennoj nauki. 2020;3:45-52. (In Russ.).

14. Bhatty R. Composition and quality of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds. Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal. 1988;21(6):489-500.

15. Marinova D, Petkova N, Stoyanova A. Nutritional and amino acid evaluation of pea proteins and variability among cultivars. Foods. 2021;10:1-12.

16. Belyaeva RV. Ocenka kollekcionnogo materiala goroha po hozyajstvenno cennym priznakam. Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury. 2024;1(49):52-59. (In Russ.).

17. Veber AL, Leonova SA. Izmeneniya biologicheskoj i pishchevoj cennosti zerna goroha i fasoli v rezul'tate ego bioaktivacii. Vestnik Murmanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2024;27(3):282-293. (In Russ.).

18. Pahotina IV, Omel'yanyuk LV, Ignat'eva EYu, et al. Perspektivnye sorta goroha dlya ispol'zovaniya v krupyanoj promyshlennosti v usloviyah yuga Zapadnoj Sibiri. Zernovoe hozyajstvo Rossii. 2023;4:28-34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2023-87-4-28-34. (In Russ.).

19. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya sel'skohozyajstvennyh kul'tur. Tekhnologicheskaya ocenka zernovyh, krupyanyh i zernobobovyh kul'tur. Moscow;1988. (In Russ.).

20. Dospekhov BA. Methods of field experiment (with the basics of statistical processing of research results). Moscow: Agropromizdat; 1985. P. 150–200. (In Russ.).

21. Shanthakumar P. The current situation of pea protein and its application in the food industry. Molecules. 2022;27(16):5354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165354.

22. Semenova EV, Vasipov VV, Anisimova IN. Identifikaciya dubletnyh obrazcov goroha (Pisum sativum L.) v kollekcii VIR. Trudy po prikladnoj botanike, genetike i selekcii. 2022;183(1):147-156. (In Russ.).

23. Majstrenko OA. Ocenka perspektivnyh linij goroha po pishchevym kachestvam i urozhajnosti semyan. Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury. 2019;4:31-35. (In Russ.).

24. Brailova IS, Filatova IA, Yur'eva NI, et al. Ocenka perspektivnyh sortoobrazcov goroha po kachestvu i vzaimosvyaz' biohimicheskih pokazatelej s urozhajnost'yu i massoj 1000 zeren. Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury. 2020;3:20-25. (In Russ.).

25. Davletov FA, Gajnullina KP, Badamshina EV, et al. Hozyajstvenno-biologicheskaya i tekhnologicheskaya ocenka sortov i linij goroha selekcii bashkirskogo NIISH UFIC RAN. Bulletin of KSAU. 2023;12:98-104. (In Russ.).

26. Bekmagambetov AM., Sulejmenov MK. Semenovedenie polevyh kul'tur. Almaty. 2018. 324 p. (In Russ.).

27. Lihachyov VK, Afanas'ev DS. Kachestvo semyan i posevnye svojstva. Moscow: Kolos; 2016. 256 p. (In Russ.).

28. Chukanov NA, Gordeev AS. Vliyanie massy 1000 semyan na vskhozhest' i energiyu prorastaniya zernobobovyh kul'tur. Agrarnaya nauka. 2020;4:45-50. (In Russ.).

29. Lihachyov VK, Afanas'ev DS. Semenovedenie i kachestvo posevnogo materiala. Moscow: Kolos; 2017. 288 p. (In Russ.).

30. Begalinova KA, Sejtkarimov AS. Rol' kalibrovki i vyravnennosti semyan v formirovanii urozhajnosti zernobobovyh kul'tur. Vestnik rastenievodstva. 2021;3:52-59. (In Russ.).

31. Shuvalov IP, Korneev AP. Posevnye kachestva i tekhnologicheskie svojstva semyan zernovyh i zernobobovyh kul'tur. Saint Petersburg: Lan'; 2020. 240 p. (In Russ.).


Login or Create
* Forgot password?