FEED ADDITIVES FROM AGRO-INDUSTRIAL WASTE AND THEIR EFFECT ON BROILER CHICKENS INTERNAL ORGANS DEVELOPMENT
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The objective of the study is to determine the effect of a non-traditional feed additive based on modified brewer's grains on the development of internal organs and serum biochemistry in broiler chickens. Research was conducted on Arbor Acres broiler chickens in the vivarium of the Federal State Budget Scientific Institution Krasnodar Research Centre for Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine. Two groups of 42 birds each were formed using the pair-analog method. All test birds were housed in single-tier cages with mesh floors and free access to feed and water. The duration of the scientific experiment was 40 days. Feeding the studied feed additive to the second group's diets resulted in a 2.9 % increase in live weight compared to the control. Average daily feed intake by the test birds increased by 2.3 % compared to the control. However, feed costs per 1 kg of live weight gain decreased by 0.6 %. The obtained data on the biochemical composition of chicken blood serum indicate the absence of a negative impact of the studied feed on metabolic processes in the body of broilers. The results of the control slaughter indicate that there were no abnormalities in the development of the internal organs of the test birds. The gizzard size of the birds receiving the studied supplement significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased by 12.9 % compared to the control. The use of the studied feed in diets for meat chickens does not have a negative impact on their metabolic processes or the development of internal organs.

Keywords:
broiler chickens, broiler chicken diet, brewer's grains, corn steep liquor, perlite, corn meal, biochemical parameters of broiler chicken blood serum
References

1. Kleyn FJ, Ciacciariello M. Future demands of the poultry industry: will we meet our commitments sustainably in developed and developing economies? J. World’s Poult. Sci. 2021;77:267-278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2021.1904314.

2. Van Dijk M, Morley T, Rau ML, Saghai Y. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nat. Food. 2021;2:494-501. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00322-9.

3. Hafez HM, Attia YA. Challenges to the poultry industry: current perspectives and strategic future after the COVID-19 outbreak. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020;7:516. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00516.

4. Grˇzini´c G, Piotrowicz-Cie´slak A, Klimkowicz-Pawlas A, et al. Intensive poultry farming: a review of the impact on the environment and human health. Science of The Total Environment. 2022;858(part 3):160014. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160014.

5. Giannenas I, Bonos E, Anestis V, et al. Effects of protease addition and replacement of soybean meal by corn gluten meal on the growth of broilers and on the environmental performances of a broiler production system in Greece. PLoS One. 2017;12 (1):e0169511. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169511.

6. Kolomiets SN, Egorova MA. Effectiveness of using unconventional algae feed additive in feeding broilers of cross Cobb 500. Agricultural and Livestock Technology. 2020;3(4). (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.15838/alt.2020.3.4.2 URL: http://azt-journal.ru/article/28757?_lang=en.

7. Tsementzis AK, Maina AN, De Cloet CA, et al. Comparative impact of partial replacement of soybean meal with select specialty protein ingredients in broiler chicken starter feeding program on growth, organ, intestinal, plasma, and litter attributes to 49 days of age. Poultry Science. 2025;104(9):105408. doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105408.

8. Selina T, YAdrishchenskaya T, SHpynova S et al. Sorgo saharnoe dlya brojlerov. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii. 2022;10:11-12. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.25701/ZZR.2022.09.09.009.

9. Omede AA, Iji PA. Response of broiler chickens to processed soy protein product when offered at different inclusion levels in mash or crumbled prestarter diets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2018;27(is. 2):159-171. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfx048.

10. Andika A, Perdana T, Chaerani D. et al. Transitioning towards zero waste in the agri-food supply chain: a review of sustainable circular agri-food supply chain. Sustainable Futures. 2025;10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100917.

11. Kadhim MJ, Ulsagheer MK. Single and combined effect of plant extracts (Ocimum sanctum and Silybum marianum) on growth performance of broilers. Journal of Animal Health and Production. 2025;13:118-123. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2025/13.1.118.123.

12. Koni TNI, Paga A, Asrul A, et al. Growth Performance of Java Super Chickens Fed Fermented Rice Bran during the Starter Phase. Journal of animal health and production. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2025/13.1.149.153.

13. FAO. 2020. Environmental performance of feed additives in livestock supply chains – Guidelines for assessment – Version 1. Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance Partnership (FAO LEAP). Rome. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9744en.

14. Mariutti LRB, Rebelo KS, Bisconsin-Junior A, et al. The use of alternative food sources to improve health and guarantee access and food intake. Food Research International. 2021;149: 110709. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110709.

15. Papunidi EK, Smolencev SYU, Stepanova GS, et al Vliyanie biologicheski aktivnoj dobavki na osnove ekstrakta amaranta na myasnuyu produktivnost' cyplyat-brojlerov. Vestnik of the Mari state university. Chapter "Agriculture. Economics". 2020;6(3):304-311. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.30914/2411-9687-2020-6-3-304-310.

16. Miranda DJA, Vieira SL, Favero A et al. Performance and meat production of broiler chickens fed diets formulated at different crude protein levels supplemented or not with L-valine and L-isoleucine. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2015;206:39-47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.04.018.

17. Kandel M, Toghyani M, Macelline SP, et al. The impact of soybean meal and field peas inclusion on growth performance, carcass traits and nutrient digestibilities in broiler chickens offered wheat-based diets. Animal Nutrition. 2025;22:113-126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2025.03.011.

18. Samatova AA, Makaeva AR, Murtazina ZD, et al. Issledovanie pitatel'noj cennosti i bezopasnosti kormov, proizvedennyh iz othodov spirtovyh proizvodstv. Veterinarnyj vrach. 2021;2:50-55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33632/1998-698H.2021-2-50-55. (In Russ.).

19. Fomenko IA, Kerimova GM. Biokonversiya rastitel'nyh othodov v kormovye i pishchevye drozhzhevye preparaty. Novye tekhnologii. 2022;18(1):78-85. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47370/2072-0920-2022-18-1-78-85. (In Russ).

20. Mitrofanova IA, Alikina TA, Chepushtanova OV. Netradicionnye istochniki kormleniya sel'skohozyajstvennoj pticy. Molodezh' i nauka. 2024(3). (In Russ).

21. Agarkova N.V. Kukuruznyj ekstrakt v kormlenii cyplyat-brojlerov. V sb.: VI Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya «Forum molodyh issledovatelej». Penza, 2023. S. 66–68. (In Russ).

22. Siddique S, Grassauer F, Arulnathan V, et al. A review of life cycle impacts of different pathways for converting food waste into livestock feed. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2024;46:310-323. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.023.

23. Chen Y, Xu W, Zhan L, et al. Geoenvironmental issues in high-food-waste-content municipal solid waste landfills Journal of the Indian Institute Science. 2021;101 (4):603-623. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-021-00233-5.

24. Sun X, Dou Z, Shurson GC. Bioprocessing to upcycle agro-industrial and food wastes into high-nutritional value animal feed for sustainable food and agriculture systems. Bioprocessing to upcycle agro-industrial and food wastes into high-nutritional value animal feed for sustainable food and agriculture systems. Resources, conservation and Recycling. 2024;201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023. 107325.

25. Kaloev B. Obogashchaem racion kukuruznoj bardoj. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii. 2019;S3:24-25. (In Russ).

26. Kaloev B, CHertkoev G. Suhaya barda i Fidbest VGPro: optimiziruem zatraty. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii. 2018;12:16-17. (In Russ.).

27. VerBeek ZK, DeLeon C, Kerr BJ et al. Amino acid and energy digestibility of conventional corn dried distillers grains with solubles, high protein distillers dried grains, and corn fermented protein, and impacts on turkey poult growth performance and intestinal characteristics. Poultry Science. 2024;103(is. 10):104082. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104082.

28. Bitieva IA, SHabanova IA, Britaev BB, et al. Vliyanie pivnoj drobiny na produktivnye pokazateli cyplyat-brojlerov krossa «Ross-308». Proceedings of Gorsky state agrarian university. 2024;61(2):54-61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.54258/20701047_2024_61_2_54. (In Russ.).

29. Bitieva IA, SHabanova IA, Britaev BB, et al. Ispol'zovanie pivnoj drobiny v kormlenii yaichnyh kur // Proceedings of Gorsky state agrarian university. 2024;61(1):60-67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.54258/20701047_2024_61_1_60. (In Russ.).

30. Dzagurov BA, Kaloev SA. Granulirovannaya suhaya zernovaya barda s bentonitom v racionah kormleniya kur-nesushek. Proceedings of Gorsky state agrarian university. 2020;57(1):37-43. (In Russ.).

31. Razumovskaya ES. Assessment of the quality and safety of mineral additives from seafood shells in the diet of poultry. Innovations and Food Safety. 2022;4:131-137. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.31677/2311-0651-2022-38-4-131-137.

32. Reznichenko LV, Reznichenko AA, Musienko VV. Novye biologicheski-aktivnye dobavki v brojlernom pticevodstve. Actual issues in agricultural biology. 2020;3:28-33. (In Russ.).

33. Kosyak A.P. Morfologicheskie pokazateli krovi cyplyat-brojlerov pri vklyuchenii v racion ad-sorbenta kormovogo «Sorbovit»V sb.: 103-j Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskayaj konferen-ciya studentov i magistrantov «Studenty – nauke i praktike APK». Vitebsk: VGAVM, 2018. Ch. 1. S. 237–239.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?