POTATO VARIETIES PRODUCTIVITY DEPENDING ON THE USE OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE SOUTHERN NON-CHERNOZEM REGION
Rubrics: AGRONOMY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The aim of research is to study the influence of natural regulators Mival–Agro, KRP, Megafol, Zh and Ecopin, TPS on the growth processes, yield and quality of potato varieties Vympel and Krasa Meshchery during the preparation of planting material and the treatment of plants during their growth and development. The objects of research were two mid-season potato varieties: Vympel, Krasa Meshchery and three growth regulators: Mival-Agro, KPR; Megafol, Zh; Ecopin, TPS. Experimental design: 1 – control (tubers and plants without treatment); 2 – Megafol, Zh (tubers – 4 ml/t, plants – 0.4 ml/ha); 3 – Mival-Agro, KPR (tubers – 2 g/t, plants – 20 g/ha); 4 – Ecopin, TPS (tubers – 0.1 kg/t, plants – 0.3 kg/ha). A study of the effectiveness of plant growth regulators (Mival-Agro, KRP; Megafol, Zh; Ecopin, TPS) on the Vympel and Krasa Meshchery potato varieties demonstrated their positive impact on plant growth, development, yield, and product quality. The use of Megafol, Zh, and Ecopin, TPS, also stimulated bud germination, reaching 77.6 and 72.4 % for Vympel potatoes, and 76.9 and 70.4 % for Krasa Meshchery potatoes, respectively. Field germination of the studied potato varieties increased by 3.8–5.6 % compared to the control group. The use of the Mival-Agro growth regulator, KRP, resulted in the maximum yield compared to the control variant: Vympel – 38.7 c/ha (+18.2 %), Krasa Meshchery – 36.3 c/ha (+17.8 %). The use of the Megafol, Zh, and Ecopin, TPS growth regulators also contributed to the increase in the yield of the two varieties, but to a lesser extent: Vympel – 30.6 (+14.4 %) and 30.2 c/ha (+14.2 %); Krasa Meshchery – 27.8 (+13.7 %) and 26.7 c/ha (+13.1 %), respectively.

Keywords:
growth regulators, new potato varieties, potatoes, potato quality characteristics, growth regulator efficiency, potato yield
References

1. Butenko MS, Ul'yanova OA, Halipskij AN, et al. Dejstvie vozrastayushchih doz vermikomposta na agrohimicheskie svojstva pochvy, urozhajnost' i kachestvo klubnej kartofelya. Agricultural Chemistry. 2020;7:47-56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002188120070042. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RKEBCI.

2. Gulidova VA, Zubkova TV. Tekhnohimicheskij kontrol' rastenievodcheskoj produkcii. Elec: EGU; 2020. 174 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HFNETQ.

3. Metodika po izucheniyu kartofelya v VNIIKH: metodicheskij material. Moscow: VNIIKH; 1996. 83 p.

4. Byshov N.V., Vinogradov D.V., Terekhina O.N., Golubenko M.I. Sposob primeneniya biologicheskih preparatov v tekhnologii vozdelyvaniya kartofelya na seryh lesnyh pochvah Central'nogo Nechernozem'ya. Patent № 2731579 C1. 25.11.2019. Byul. 25. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NZBSAL.

5. Pityurina IS, Vinogradov DV, Gogmachadze GD. Effektivnost' dejstviya guminovogo preparata na produktivnost' kartofelya. AgroEkoInfo. 2020;4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JMHYRR.

6. Pityurina IS, Vinogradov DV. Produktivnost' i fitosanitarnaya ocenka agrocenozov kartofelya v usloviyah Nechernozem'ya. Bulletin of KSAU. 2021;12:59-64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2021-12-59-64. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VCDVCA.

7. Sokolov AA, Lupova EI, Mazirov MA, et al. Monitoring fitosanitarnogo sostoyaniya agrocenozov v usloviyah Ryazanskoj oblasti. Vladimir agricolist, 2020;4:46-52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24411/2225-2584-2020-10145. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FWIIHP.

8. Terehina ON, Vinogradov DV. Urozhajnost' i kachestvo klubnej kartofelya pri ispol'zovanii biopreparatov. Herald of Ryazan state agrotechnological university named after P. A. Kostychev. 2019;1:155-159.

9. Terekhina ON, Vinogradov DV, Gogmachadze GD, et al. Biopreparaty kak faktor povysheniya urozhajnosti kartofelya. AgroEkoInfo. 2017;4. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YNGYHR

10. Halipskij AN, Churakov AA, Popova NM. Urozhajnost' i osnovnye pokazateli kachestva obrazcov kartofelya v konkursnom ispytanii. Bulletin of KSAU. 2022;11:70-76. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36718/1819-4036-2022-11-70-76 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YVZWFO

11. Halipskij AN, Churakov AA, Abduraimov PO. Rezul'taty izucheniya sortov kartofelya iz razlichnyh ekologo-geograficheskih zon v usloviyah Krasnoyarskoj lesostepi. Advances in current natural sciences. 2018;12:111-116. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PMSQGH.

12. Halipskij AN. Rol' ekotipa sorta i uslovij vyrashchivaniya v effektivnosti sortosmeny kartofelya v Krasnoyarskom krae. Bulletin of KSAU. 2008;3:130-136. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IUJVAL.

13. Ushakov RN, Pityurina IS, Vinogradov DV, et al. Ekologo-agrohimicheskaya ocenka ustojchivosti seroj lesnoj pochvy k vozdejstviyu zagryazneniya i urozhajnost' kartofelya pri primenenii udobrenij. AgroEkoInfo. 2024;3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.51419/202143328. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FROEON.

14. Ilinsky AV, Vinogradov DV, Politaeva NA, et al. Features of the Phytoremediation by Agricultural Crops of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soils. Agronomy. 2023;13(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010127. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OQHNKY.

15. Vinogradov DV, Terekhina ON, Byshov NV, et al. Features of applying biological preparations in the technology of potato growing on gray forest soils. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2018;7(4):242-246. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IMSGCW.

16. Khalipsky AN, Churakov AA. Results of competitive testing of potato varieties in the environmental conditions of the Krasnoyarsk forest-steppe. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Krasnoyarsk. Krasnoyarsk: IOP Publishing Ltd; 2022. P. 22–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/981/2/022034. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OOPVRT.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?